Later Comneni
The policies of Alexius I were continued by his son John II Comnenus
(reigned 1118 - 43) and his grandson Manuel I Comnenus (reigned
1143 - 80). In the 12th century there was a growing involvement
of the Western powers in the affairs of the East, as well as an
increasingly complex political situation in Europe. In Asia, too,
matters were complicated by the conflict between the Seljuqs and
the Danishmends, by the emergence of the kingdom of Lesser Armenia
in Cilicia, and by the activities of the crusader states. Foreign
relations and skillful diplomacy became of paramount importance
for the Byzantines. John II tried and failed to break what was becoming
the Venetian monopoly of Byzantine trade, and he sought to come
to terms with the new kingdom of Hungary, to whose ruler he was
related by marriage. Alexius I had seen the importance of Hungary,
lying between the Western and Byzantine empires, a neighbour of
the Venetians and the Serbs. More ominous still was the establishment
of the Norman Kingdom of Sicily under Roger II in 1130. But John
II astutely allied himself with the Western emperor against it.
Manuel I realized even more clearly that Byzantium could not presume
to ignore or offend the new powers in the West, and he went out
of his way to understand and to appease them. Certain aspects of
the Western way of life appealed to Manuel. His first and second
wives were both Westerners, and Latins were welcomed at his court
and even granted estates and official appointments. This policy
was distasteful to most of his subjects; and it was unfortunate
for his intentions that the Second Crusade occurred early in his
reign (1147), for it aggravated the bitterness between Greeks and
Latins and brought Byzantium deeper than ever into the tangled politics
of western Europe. Its leaders were Louis VII of France and the
emperor Conrad III, and its failure was blamed on Byzantine treachery.
The French king discussed with Roger of Sicily the prospect of attacking
Constantinople, and in 1147 Roger invaded Greece. But Manuel retained
the personal friendship and the alliance of Conrad III against the
Normans and even planned a joint Byzantine-German campaign against
them in Italy.
No such cooperation was possible with Conrad's successor, Frederick
I Barbarossa, after 1152. To Frederick, the alliance between the
Holy Roman Empire and what he called "the kingdom of the Greeks"
was not one between equals. Manuel launched a vain invasion of the
Norman kingdom on his own account in 1154, but it was too late for
a revival of Byzantine imperialism in the West. It was hard for
the Byzantines to accept the fact that their empire might soon become
simply one among a number of Christian principalities.
In the Balkans and in the Latin East Manuel was more successful.
His armies won back much of the northwest Balkans and almost conquered
Hungary, reducing it to a client kingdom of Byzantium. The Serbs,
too, under their leader Stephen Nemanja, were kept under control,
while Manuel's dramatic recovery of Antioch in 1159 caused the crusaders
to treat the Emperor with a new respect. But in Anatolia he overreached
himself. To forestall the formation of a single Turkish sultanate,
Manuel invaded the Seljuq territory of Rum in 1176. His army was
surrounded and annihilated at Myriocephalon. The battle marked the
end of the Byzantine counteroffensive against the Turks begun by
Alexius I. Its outcome delighted the Western emperor, Frederick
I Barbarossa, who had supported the Seljuq sultan of Rum against
Manuel and who now openly threatened to take over the Byzantine
Empire by force.
Manuel's personal relationships with the crusaders and with other
Westerners remained cordial to the end. But his policies had antagonized
the Holy Roman Empire, the papacy, the Normans, and, not least,
the Venetians. His effort to revive Byzantine prestige in Italy
and the Balkans, and his treaties with Genoa (1169) and Pisa (1170),
roused the suspicions of Venice; and in 1171, following an anti-Latin
demonstration in Constantinople, all Venetians in the empire were
arrested and their property was confiscated. The Venetians did not
forget this episode. They, too, began to think in terms of putting
Constantinople under Western control as the only means of securing
their interest in Byzantine trade.
Manuel's policies antagonized many of his own people as well. His
favouritism to the Latins was unpopular, as was his lavish granting
of estates in pronoia. A reaction set in shortly after his death
in 1180, originated by his cousin Andronicus I Comnenus, who ascended
to the throne after another anti-Latin riot in Constantinople. Andronicus
murdered Manuel's widow and son Alexius II. He posed as the champion
of Byzantine patriotism and of the oppressed peasantry. But to enforce
his reforms he behaved like a tyrant. By undermining the power of
the aristocracy he weakened the empire's defenses and undid much
of Manuel's work. The King of Hungary broke his treaty, and Stephen
Nemanja of Serbia declared his independence from Byzantium and founded
a new Serbian kingdom. Within the empire, too, disintegration proceeded.
In 1185 Isaac Comnenus, governor of Cyprus, set himself up as independent
ruler of the island. In the same year the Normans again invaded
Greece and captured Thessalonica. The news prompted a counterrevolution
in Constantinople, and Andronicus was murdered.
He was the last of the Comnenian family to wear the crown. His
successor, Isaac II Angelus, was brought to power by the aristocracy.
His reign, and, still more, that of his brother Alexius III, saw
the collapse of what remained of the centralized machinery of Byzantine
government and defense. Isaac tried at least to keep his foreign
enemies in check. The Normans were driven out of Greece in 1185.
But in 1186 the Bulgars began a rebellion that was to lead to the
formation of the Second Bulgarian Empire. Matters were not made
easier by the arrival of the Third Crusade, provoked by the loss
of Jerusalem to the Muslim leader Saladin in 1187. One of its leaders
was Frederick I Barbarossa, whose avowed intention was to conquer
Constantinople. He died on his way to Syria. But Richard I the Lion-Heart
of England appropriated Cyprus from Isaac Comnenus, and the island
never again reverted to Byzantine rule.
|