Justinian I : internal affairs and
the Church
Internal policy
Justinian's best-known work was as a codifier and legislator. He
greatly stimulated legal studies, and in 528 he set up a commission
to produce a new code of imperial enactments or constitutions, the
Codex Constitutionum. This
was published in 529, and in 530 a second commission sat to codify
the Roman jurists; the work of this commission, known as the Digest
(Digesta), appeared in 533. At the same time, a handbook for the
use of law students, the Institutes (Institutiones), was prepared
and published in 533. A second edition of the Codex Justinianus
containing Justinian's own laws up to the date of issue was published
in 534. His subsequent legislative work to 565 is known as the Novels
(Novellae Constitutiones Post Codicem). Much of this legal activity
was inspired and supervised by Tribonian, the emperor's most important
judicial minister. (See Justinian,
Code of.)
Justinian was genuinely concerned with promoting the well-being
of his subjects by rooting out corruption and providing easily accessible
justice. This involved adequate control over provincial governors
and some administrative reorganization. At the same time it was
essential to provide revenue for Justinian's various military campaigns,
particularly in the West. Justinian knew how to pick his servants.
He had two outstanding ministers. One was John of Cappadocia from
Asia Minor, and the other was Peter Barsymes, a Syrian. John was
praetorian prefect from 531 to 541, Peter from 543.
The first important reform was the prohibition of the suffragia,
or sale of provincial governorships, in 535, for it was clear that
new governors' desire to recoup the heavy initial expense of purchasing
their office accounted for much extortion inflicted by them upon
the provincial populaces. Instructions were drawn up for provincial
governors, and the position of the defensores civitatis, the officials
whose duty it was to protect the cities, was strengthened and their
jurisdiction widened so that provincials did not need to have the
expense of going to the governor's court. At the same time, there
was a reorganization of the provincial system. Changes were made
in the dioceses of Asiana, Pontica, and Oriens and in Egypt involving
the abolition of the vicariates (administrative officials) and the
regrouping of the provinces, thus effecting some economy. In some
cases (e.g., Egypt and Cappadocia, where only purely internal civil
disorders might arise), civil and military authority was combined
and the governor given the higher rank of spectabilis (notable)
with final jurisdiction in cases of less than 500, later 750, solidi.
But where it might be necessary for the duces to defend a strategic
point against an enemy, the civil and military powers remained distinct,
as in Syria.
These rather piecemeal changes sometimes resulted in situations
in which, despite Justinian's efforts, the provincial governor was
unwilling or not sufficiently strong to enforce good government;
and with the disappearance of the larger unit of the vicariate,
there was nothing left but an expensive appeal to Constantinople.
In order to meet these difficulties, there was a partial renewal
of a different kind of vicariate after John of Cappadocia's fall.
Under both John and his successor, Peter Barsymes, finance was of
primary concern, since wars and subsidies to foreign powers and
barbarian rulers were expensive. Regained provinces, especially
in Italy, were often so devastated that they could not pay their
way, and income from these provinces was, therefore, irregular.
The money was found, however, largely through the financial ability
of Justinian's two ministers. Taxes were efficiently collected,
accounts audited, misappropriations tracked down, public expenses
pruned, and city spectacles and municipal services cut down—thus
alienating rich and poor alike both in the provinces and in the
capital. One important source of revenue came from trade and industry
that had long been vigorously promoted in the Roman Empire, particularly
with India, Southeast Asia, and China. Spices, perfumes, and raw
silk were among the most important imports. Persian hostility could
cause prices to rise or even stop supplies. A feature of this period
was the introduction of the silkworm from Sogdiana (Samarkand and
Bukhara), so that the Byzantine market eventually achieved an independent
supply of silk. The sale of raw material was a government monopoly,
and Peter Barsymes, Justinian's finance minister, extended this
to silk fabrics, thus creating another lucrative state monopoly.
Government attempts to root out abuses and its attacks on vested
interest, whether of rich or poor, were unpopular. In 532 public
discontent was voiced most dramatically in Constantinople by the
Nika revolt (“Nika”—“Conquer,” or “Win”—was the cry of rival factions
at the races in the hippodrome). The city parties known as the Greens
and the Blues united and attacked and set fire to the city prefect's
office and public buildings, as well as to part of the imperial
palace and the Church of the Holy Wisdom adjoining it. Then they
gathered in the hippodrome, calling for the dismissal of the city
prefect and of Justinian's two ministers, John the Cappadocian and
the advocate Tribonian. Justinian agreed, but the mob was by now
out of control and perhaps exploited by interested parties. The
next day the late emperor Anastasius' nephew Hypatius was proclaimed
emperor and was supported by certain senators. The crowd and the
usurper assembled in the hippodrome. At this point two factors saved
Justinian. Theodora persuaded him to stand his ground, and the generals
in the city, Belisarius and Mundus, mustered what troops they could
and resolutely turned on the mob in the hippodrome. They gained
the upper hand, helped by Narses, though only at the cost of a wholesale
massacre of the rebellious citizens. Hypatius was executed. The
uprising had nearly cost Justinian his throne.
Justinian's wars, the maintenance of an efficient army and navy,
and his subsidies to foreign powers and to barbarians were costly,
but so was his building program (which is described in detail in
Procopius' book On Buildings [De aedificiis]). This program included
public works, such as aqueducts and bridges, the rebuilding of whole
cities devastated by earthquakes (a recurring and expensive item
throughout the reign), as well as essential fortifications and defenses
on the extensive frontiers. It also included buildings such as monasteries,
orphanages, hostels, and churches. Two of his churches, Hagia Sophia
and SS. Sergius and Bacchus (called Little Hagia Sophia), still
stand in Constantinople (now Istanbul). In Hagia Sophia his architects
achieved one of the finest and most justly famed buildings in the
world.
Ecclesiastical policy
In the Byzantine Empire, church and state were indissolubly linked
as essential aspects of a single Christian empire that was thought
of as the terrestrial counterpart of the heavenly polity. It was
therefore the duty of Justinian, as it was for later Byzantine emperors,
to promote the good government of the church and to uphold orthodox
teaching. This explains why so many of his laws deal in detail with
religious problems. Pagans, heretics, and Samaritans, for instance,
were forbidden to teach any subject whatsoever, and, though fully
appreciative of the classical heritage, Justinian expelled pagan
teachers from the once-famous Academy at Athens, an action directed
against paganism rather than Greek philosophy.
Justinian's main doctrinal problem was the conflict between the
orthodox view accepted at the Council
of Chalcedon (451), that the divine and human natures coexist
in Christ, and the Monophysite
teaching that emphasized his divine nature. Monophysitism was strongly
held in Syria and Egypt and was closely allied to growing national
feelings and resentment of Byzantine rule. Justinian, whose wife,
Theodora, was a strong champion of the Monophysites, did not wish
to lose the eastern provinces, but he knew, on the other hand, that
any concessions to them would almost certainly alienate Rome and
the West. Justinian tried to compel the orthodox Western bishops
to arrive at a compromise with the Monophysites, and he even went
so far as to hold Pope Vigilius against his will in Constantinople
and to condemn some writings by important church figures in Antioch
in an effort to achieve his aim. The second Council
of Constantinople (553) finally reaffirmed the Chalcedonian
position and condemned the Antioch suspect writings. Justinian achieved
nothing by the episode, however; he did not conciliate the Monophysites,
he enraged Antioch by the attack on its teachers, and he aroused
Rome particularly by his handling of Pope Vigilius and his attempt
to determine doctrinal matters. The decrees of the council were
not accepted by Vigilius' successors, and a schism thus occurred
between Rome and Constantinople that lasted until 610.
Toward the end of his reign, Justinian to some extent withdrew
from public affairs and was occupied with theological problems.
He even lapsed into heresy when, at the end of 564, he issued an
edict stating that the human body of Christ was incorruptible and
only seemed to suffer (the doctrine called Aphthartodocetism). This
roused immediate protest, and many ecclesiastics refused to subscribe
to it, but the matter was dropped with the emperor's death, at which
time the throne passed to his nephew Justin
II in 565. To describe Justinian's interest and activity in
church affairs as caesaropapism (state in control of the church)
is misleading. Justinian, like succeeding Byzantine emperors, regarded
himself as the viceregent of Christ, and the Eastern Roman Empire
knew no such clear-cut distinction between church and state as developed
in Latin Christendom.
|